So don't think only because you are not such a player that there are no others out there in the world.
When the other player cant fight he must watch and even when they must watch it for 1h and cant do anything else than turn the camera, people play it.
And Shogun is round based strategy game with rts battles. It is the same as you play it in the single player+you have a good mate or a very difficult enemy when you play against the human. Shogun 2 with one friend over 50h in the same MP campaign. Ive played Since of a Solare Empire with those friends for 48h and the game was not over jet. Those other games who I write, do that even bigger. CCGM is not so huge and not so complex that make it easy peacy in my eyes when I compare it to your problems who you are see it. I played with 3 friends Arma2 for 10h with no bio-break, sometimes and why? Because it is huge and complex. should I go on? There are much more games out with much more consumable time to get the game over. So Scepticer you dont know Arma and OPF? Do you? And you dont know games like civilization,Shogun 2, Heroes of Might and Magic, Since of a Solar Empire. I really hope this game is successful enough so that a sequel is possible. A sequel or expansion, something paid for is the only realistic option if it should be any good.
Games like carrier command 2 mod#
I think the devs should concentrate on releasing bug fixes, minor tweaks and mod capability.Ī multiplayer version should be an entirely new game. People seem so caught in the FPS aspect of this game that they tend to forget about the strategic. I can go on and on about very difficult gameplay problems that has to be overcome to make this a multiplayer game. As they are today they are kind of pointless if they were between two players, it's just fire away and hope for the best. How do you balance this type of game? How do you avoid that one player get the upper hand and that the last 2-3 hours is just a long pain until it is over for the other player? How do you avoid the opposite, that tables can turn too quickly? Another issues is carrier vs. And I can't even imagine how this game could be a drop-in-drop-out game like many of the popular FPS's. Not many want to play that long with random (often annoying) strangers. Not many have a best-best-friend who want to play with you that long.
How do you make that fun in multi-player? Not many people want to invest several hours playing against another human opponent with the risk of loosing. In its foundation this is a SLOW game strategy game with LONG sessions. Secondly there are a lot of gameplay questions. It is loads of work to convert the game from standalone to a client-server type of game. On top of that, get into each and every vehicle and take part in the action!Īn illustrious heritageCarrier Command is an ’80s strategy classic well known for its unique blend of strategy and vehicle simulation.It is not so easy as people might think to implement multiplayer in this game.įirst off it is the technical aspect which the devs have pointed out. TeamworkMake the most of different unit types synergies and create combined arms assaults to efficiently win battles. Ensuring these supply lines remain open will be key to your survival. PlanOnce you have taken an island you will need to exploit and defend the resources it provides. The approach you take to a situation will play a big part in the outcome. StrategizeGather intel from your vehicles’ radars, pick your tools of the trade, and launch your attacks where the enemy presence is thinner. Get in the shoes of an admiral and lead from the front. True to MicroProse's heritage, Carrier Command 2 is all about meaningful decisions.Ĭommand and ControlTake command of a carrier and operate its systems to launch your offensive and conquer the Archipelago. Note: This game can be played in non-virtual reality mode, and also in virtual reality.Ĭarrier Command 2 is Strategy, Planning and Teamwork on a scale that is both engaging and manageable.
0 kommentar(er)
